Flooding fears could sink Helston homes plan

First published in News

Flooding fears could be at risk of sinking plans to develop a Helston eyesore into eight homes.

Helston Town Council's planning committee was asked to consider the latest version of an application that would see a barn converted into a home and an extra seven homes built on land at St Johns Road.

The land currently has a number of redundant buildings, including a former workshop, old storage shed and animal stalls.

An application was first submitted in 2009 and this is the latest version from applicants Mr Speck and Mr Pearce.

However, the town councillors recommended refusal of the plans, as they believed the scale of the development increased the flood risk in a flood plain to other homes in the area.

Earlier in the evening councillors were spoken to by one of the applicants, in a bid to allay previous concerns. This included confirmation that the Environment Agency (EA) believed the development would be acceptable.

In answer to arguments that it would be an overdevelopment of the site, he said the scheme had been reduced from ten homes to eight and he had decided to allow more green areas and two car parking spaces per property.

Over concerns about “grey” water (sewage/outflow) water backing up, he said the water board had asked to install a large bore water supply to alleviate problems and further work could be carried out if necessary.

All traffic would use the old farm entrance, with no need to go into St Johns Close.

He argued the development would be an improvement to the site and provide “much needed housing for Helston.”

There were mixed feelings from neighbours. Two, in support, said they did not have concerns over an increase in traffic, as previously the site had been used by companies that regularly attracted 60 to 70 vehicles - far more than eight homes would result in.

During flooding at the end of November it had taken only 15 minute for St Johns to flood, but the yard was not affected.

However, another resident said she was afraid two of the properties would overlook her garden and was concerned that visitors' cars might be parked in St Johns Close.

She also questioned how an oil tank, which she believed would be buried under the site, would be removed.

Since that meeting Judith Haycock, Cornwall Councillor for the Helston Central division, has written to the county's planning department to say although the site was “in desperate need of development” she agreed with the town council's concerns over developing in a flood zone.

She called for confirmation from the EA that there was adequate floodplain compensation, to ensure any development did not affect other properties in the area.

Mrs Haycock had further concerns over the height of the terrace of five properties proposed as part of the development and asked that if the permission was given there be no building work before 9am and after 5pm, at weekends or on bank holidays.

A final decision will be taken by Cornwall Council.

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:49am Wed 16 Jan 13

meerkats says...

would have thought the priority at St Johns was to look into ways of stopping it getting flooded, and not build even more houses there. If the barn is so much of an eyesore ,could it just not just be demolished.
would have thought the priority at St Johns was to look into ways of stopping it getting flooded, and not build even more houses there. If the barn is so much of an eyesore ,could it just not just be demolished. meerkats
  • Score: 0

12:00pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

"Much needed housing" for whom? social rented? Affordable to buy?
Take a look on the estate agents windows, there are pleanty of dwellings for sale on Helston.

The flooding issue should be the priority at the moment. How about demolish the building and have a soak away built there.
"Much needed housing" for whom? social rented? Affordable to buy? Take a look on the estate agents windows, there are pleanty of dwellings for sale on Helston. The flooding issue should be the priority at the moment. How about demolish the building and have a soak away built there. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

Should have read 'in' Helston not on.
Should have read 'in' Helston not on. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

Should have read 'in' Helston not on.
Should have read 'in' Helston not on. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 0

12:37pm Wed 16 Jan 13

meerkats says...

Hate to think of the cost of house insurance there for a new build ,against flooding ,another thing to be taken into consideration. Did hear recently that some firms refuse insurance now on places that get flooded frequently, but am not sure if that is correct.
Hate to think of the cost of house insurance there for a new build ,against flooding ,another thing to be taken into consideration. Did hear recently that some firms refuse insurance now on places that get flooded frequently, but am not sure if that is correct. meerkats
  • Score: 0

4:26pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

I believe you are right meerkats.
I believe you are right meerkats. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 0

4:02pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Beth-Penryn says...

meerkats wrote:
Hate to think of the cost of house insurance there for a new build ,against flooding ,another thing to be taken into consideration. Did hear recently that some firms refuse insurance now on places that get flooded frequently, but am not sure if that is correct.
The statement of principles is due to expire in June, meaning that insurers (unless the government can sort some sort of deal out) will have no obligation to provide flood prone homes insurance. Shall have to wait and see what happens, it does seem silly to build homes in flood prone areas, perhaps they should build them on stilts!?
[quote][p][bold]meerkats[/bold] wrote: Hate to think of the cost of house insurance there for a new build ,against flooding ,another thing to be taken into consideration. Did hear recently that some firms refuse insurance now on places that get flooded frequently, but am not sure if that is correct.[/p][/quote]The statement of principles is due to expire in June, meaning that insurers (unless the government can sort some sort of deal out) will have no obligation to provide flood prone homes insurance. Shall have to wait and see what happens, it does seem silly to build homes in flood prone areas, perhaps they should build them on stilts!? Beth-Penryn
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree