Helston town council budget cut, but effects unclear

First published in News

Helston Town Council has reduced its estimated budget for the coming year by £12,700, but the effect on taxpayers is still not clear.

While a drop in the precept is usually good news for hard pressed residents, changes by the government are confusing the issue.

Cornwall Council has been told that the council tax base must come down – the effect being that households would have to pay more.

However, to offset the effect this would have, this year the government has given Cornwall Council a “council tax support grant” to distribute between town and parish councils – which means Helston gets £28,000 to take off its precept.

As a result, Helston Town Council is asking for £212,240 for the 2013/2014 financial year.

Yet the actual council tax bill can still not be calculated, until Cornwall Council makes a decision on its council tax relief scheme.

This was due to happen last week, but the council has still yet to do so. Until then, taxpayers – and local councils – remain in limbo, although it is predicted that the effect will only be a matter of pounds either way.

Helston Town Council’s budget was discussed at length by members last Thursday, having already been debated by the policy, finance and resources committee.

Councillor Keith Reynolds wanted to see the £2,000 budgeted for the town plan taken out, saying the council had talked about it for four years and he did not support more money being spent.

Supported by Councillor Mike Thomas, the remainder of the councillors disagreed and the allocation stayed, with Councillor Sue Swift saying it would “send the wrong message” that the council did not have a plan at all.

Mr Reynolds’s second proposal, to increase the staffing budget by £9,000 in order to extend the hours of the administrative assistant post to full-time, was supported, however, in a majority vote.

He said: “We are increasingly being asked to take on more and more work that effectively Cornwall Council is devolving to us. It’s putting increasing work on the office.”

The most lengthy discussion related to £2,400 set aside for “human resources and health and safety services” – effectively producing risk assessments, health and safety policies and follow-up support.

Councillor Niall Devenish said assessments produced by large companies were “broad ranging and generic” and would open up the council to potential problems further down the line.

However, Mr Reynolds described it as “quite a cheap insurance policy” in his eyes that would take “tremendous work” off town clerk Chris Dawson and the allocation was left in.

Mr Thomas’s proposal to increase the civic hospitality budget from £500 to £1,000 failed.

Read: Plan to make poorest pay takes step forward

Changes to Cornwall Council housing benefit explained - VIDEO

 

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:52am Sat 26 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

Councillor Keith Reynolds wanted to see the 2,000 taken out budgeted for the town plan. Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message that the council did not have a plan at all.

Actually It would have sent the right message, the fact that Councillor Keith Reynolds wanted it taken out would send the message that he had the sense to want to save money, Now that would have been a good plan, I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box. It is not wise in my opinion to assume all the public are stupid, and that they may assume there is no plan just because there is no specific budget set aside for a 'plan'.
Councillor Keith Reynolds wanted to see the 2,000 taken out budgeted for the town plan. Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message that the council did not have a plan at all. Actually It would have sent the right message, the fact that Councillor Keith Reynolds wanted it taken out would send the message that he had the sense to want to save money, Now that would have been a good plan, I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box. It is not wise in my opinion to assume all the public are stupid, and that they may assume there is no plan just because there is no specific budget set aside for a 'plan'. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 2

5:01am Sat 26 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

Councillor Keith Reynolds suggested taking out the 2,000 budgeted for the town plan, Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message the council did not have a plan at all.

Actually it would have sent the right message, that Councillor Keith Reynolds had the sense to want to save money. I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box.
It is not wise in my opinion to assume that some of the public are stupid and that they would think there was no plan just because there would not be 2,000 set aside for 'a plan'.
Councillor Keith Reynolds suggested taking out the 2,000 budgeted for the town plan, Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message the council did not have a plan at all. Actually it would have sent the right message, that Councillor Keith Reynolds had the sense to want to save money. I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box. It is not wise in my opinion to assume that some of the public are stupid and that they would think there was no plan just because there would not be 2,000 set aside for 'a plan'. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 2

5:12am Sat 26 Jan 13

Gill Zella Martin 09 says...

How strange is that, the first comment did not go on, when I posted the second one 9 mins later they both went on.

Incidentally, whether it appeared to some of the public as whether there was any plan or not would be easily rectified by action. Actions speak louder than words.
How strange is that, the first comment did not go on, when I posted the second one 9 mins later they both went on. Incidentally, whether it appeared to some of the public as whether there was any plan or not would be easily rectified by action. Actions speak louder than words. Gill Zella Martin 09
  • Score: 1

10:34am Mon 28 Jan 13

ronedgcumbe says...

Gill Zella Martin 09 wrote:
Councillor Keith Reynolds suggested taking out the 2,000 budgeted for the town plan, Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message the council did not have a plan at all.

Actually it would have sent the right message, that Councillor Keith Reynolds had the sense to want to save money. I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box.
It is not wise in my opinion to assume that some of the public are stupid and that they would think there was no plan just because there would not be 2,000 set aside for 'a plan'.
Would be funny if it wasn't taxpayers money.
[quote][p][bold]Gill Zella Martin 09[/bold] wrote: Councillor Keith Reynolds suggested taking out the 2,000 budgeted for the town plan, Councillor Sue Swift said it would send the wrong message the council did not have a plan at all. Actually it would have sent the right message, that Councillor Keith Reynolds had the sense to want to save money. I suggest Councillor Sue Swift tries thinking outside the box. It is not wise in my opinion to assume that some of the public are stupid and that they would think there was no plan just because there would not be 2,000 set aside for 'a plan'.[/p][/quote]Would be funny if it wasn't taxpayers money. ronedgcumbe
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree