Report this comment
  • "
    Teejay wrote:
    Gill Zella Martin 09 wrote:
    Teejay wrote:
    Gill Zella Martin 09 wrote:
    Teejay wrote:
    Everyone should pay something. Whilst I don't subscribe to the view that everyone on benefits is a scrounger, for many long term claimants there isn't much incentive to earn. So 25% minimum is fair.
    Likewise in the 'everyone contributes' world, remove the concessions on 4000 odd students and however many second/holiday homes there are in Cornwall.
    When you say concessions on students do you mean the fact they pay no council tax? or the landlords ? The local council get reimbursed from the government for students in accomodation owned by landlords, if you charge landlords, this money would all go to central government as it would be business rates and the local council would lose out and everyone's council tax would probably be even dearer.
    Right. So by having central govt. pay for the students I'm still paying twice. Once to Cornwall Council, plus the part of my income tax, VAT, or whatever other taxes central govt. choose to redistribute to pay student council tax in my area.
    So however you cut it, subsidising students costs extra.
    40 to 50% of school leavers are being subsidised not only in education, but in billions of student loans that will never be recovered.
    It does not really work like that though does it. You will likely pay the same tax etc whatever the government choose to spend it on. I could say I am subsidising libraries and schools which I do not use for example, or adult social care or child minding government schemes or anything, however, we live in a democracy and have to accept that everyones needs should be considered.
    That's exactly how it works! Some of us pay at every turn while others contribute nothing.
    Of course you pay for bits you don't use, we all do.
    But we're breeding a society that thinks the world owes it a living. The real social security of the past has given way to 'Benefits', and now so many of our democratic society choose to benefit from the state the genuine hardship cases can't get a fair share of the support they need.

    A whole generation is growing up knowing that someone else will pay their debts.

    You don't have to agree, but please try to accept and respect other people's points of view. It's a free forum but you always seem to have to have the last word on every thread. No offence meant.
    I feel there is a difference between accept and respect, whilst I may not always accept an opinion and will debate on a point raised or issue, I always categorically respect others opinions. I do not always have the last word and I am never impolite to people. I often raise/quote other people's opinions simply to gain more information from them on their opinion (i notice you often quote other people's comments.) I find that if I gain more information from people about their opinions I very often see things from a different view point or even completely come round to their way of thinking which I have done very often in the past. Perfect example, I happen to agree with your last comment about the benefits system and the real cases of hardship not getting a fair share because of some that think the world owes them a living/pay their debts etc.
    I will however in future not quote your posts to debate with."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Cornwall Council votes to make the poorest pay tax

Cornwall Council gave the green light to taxing the poorest people in the county yesterday.

At an "extraordinary meeting", called because councillors' failed to come to a decision on the tax hike at their previous meeting on January 15, they gave the thumbs-up to everyone of working age on council tax benefit having their payments slashed.

This means that everyone of working age not living with their parents, regardless of their actual ability to pay, will have to pay at least 25 per cent council tax - one of the highest "minimum payment" percentages in the entire country.

A £1m safety net, described by deputy council leader Neil Burden as a "volatility fund", will be set up to support those in "the greatest need" while an additional £150,000 was earmarked for the Citizen's Advice Bureau (which announced a raft of redundancies yesterday) to help provide "information and advice."

The vote was carried by 55 for and 42 against. Two councillors abstained.

Plans to slash council tax benefit from 100 per cent to 75 per cent for those most in need came into being after central government announced last year that local authorities would be required to create their own "localised council tax support schemes" as part of changes to the national benefits system.

At the same time councils were told that the funding for the scheme was being cut by 12.5 per cent, which means that Cornwall faced a shortfall of £4.2 million.

Council leader Jim Currie said that yesterday's decision was necessary "to avoid leaving the new council [elected in May] with an unmanageable black hole."

He said there would be "no choice but to cut frontline services" if the "current level of council tax support" was maintained.

Former leader of the Cornwall Council Liberal Democrats, Doris Ansari, had called for "compassion" at the meeting and "consistency" with other local authorities in the region that have agreed to maintain current levels of council tax support.

Fellow Lib Dem Alex Folkes proposed maintaining current support levels by reducing the amount the authority spends on employing consultants, interim and agency staff.

But the meeting heard that this funding was for sickness and maternity cover and to provide emergency funding for adult care and support, children’s services, "specialist advice," libraries and one stop shops.

Conservative councillors said Mr Folkes came up with the scheme "on the back of a fag packet." 

Just 41 councillors voted to maintain the current level of support with 61 voting against.

Following a recommendation from independent councillor for Porthleven and Helston South, Andy Wallis, it was agreed to ask the council’s monitoring officer to investigate the possibility of launching a judicial review "in view of the inequitable and inappropriate nature of this cut to council tax benefit which has been passed onto the council by central government."

Councillors will decide whether to go ahead with legal action at a meeting of the full council on February 26.

It was also agreed that the council would monitor the impact of the tax changes and officers would report back by September.

 

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree