Devon author in Duchess of Cambridge 'shop-window mannequin' row
11:20am Tuesday 19th February 2013 in News
Award-winning novelist Hilary Mantel has been reported as 'attacking' the Duchess of Cambridge as a "shop-window mannequin" with no personality, whose only purpose is to breed.
During a lecture at the British Museum, the double Booker Prize winner was said to have criticised Kate as appearing to have been "gloss-varnished" with a perfect plastic smile in contrast to Princess Diana, who she described as awkward and emotionally incontinent.
Mantel's remarks were made two weeks ago during a lecture at the British Museum, organised by London Review of Books (LRB), a month after her latest novel Bring Up the Bodies won the Costa prize.
Among the things she said was: " Kate seems to have been selected for her role of princess because she was irreproachable: as painfully thin as anyone could wish, without quirks, without oddities, without the risk of the emergence of character. She appears precision-made, machine-made, so different from Diana whose human awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed in her every gesture."
She added: "In those days (Kate) was a shop-window mannequin, with no personality of her own, entirely defined by what she wore. These days she is a mother-to-be, and draped in another set of threadbare attributions. Once she gets over being sick, the press will find that she is radiant.
"They will find that this young woman's life until now was nothing, her only point and purpose being to give birth."
During the lecture Mantel went on to question whether the monarchy is a "suitable institution for a grown-up nation" in a society which sacrifices royal ladies and allows them to be entertainment.
What do you think? A manufactured controversey on a valid comment of the press and public's view of the Duchess. Read the full text of her speech and make your own mind up.
. To read the full text of her speech - delivered at the British Museum - click here.
Comments(11)
Gillian Zella Martin 09
says...
7:33pm Tue 19 Feb 13
meerkats
says...
8:06pm Tue 19 Feb 13
Lanty Slee
says...
11:35pm Tue 19 Feb 13
ucsweb
says...
8:35am Wed 20 Feb 13
If the books were any good they wouldn't need to do this.
Wave
says...
12:35pm Wed 20 Feb 13
But the paper doesn't seem to mind or compare the taxpayer paying for a much more expensive family, that are not even assessed on income by the benefits office, they are born into it. Yes, the Royal Family.
Gillian Zella Martin 09
says...
1:38pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Lord Barrington Forbes-Smythe
says...
3:06pm Wed 20 Feb 13
Thousands if not millions of us think and say similar or far worse things about (the coverage and portrayal of) the royals in the media and no one bats an eyelid.
Just because this author recently won the Booker Prize with what sounds like a boring historical novel, everyone's up in arms about it, thanks to the good old Daily Mail of course.
So it's not just the royals who are having their strings pulled by the media, is it?
Wave
says...
3:08pm Wed 20 Feb 13
I think the emphasis is on the issue that people should not have children if they are on benefits perhaps?
Whatever the issue the media should not get involved identifying individuals.
ucsweb
says...
5:26pm Wed 20 Feb 13
molesworth
says...
11:15am Fri 22 Feb 13
I know, I know...

telstar1962 says...
6:38pm Tue 19 Feb 13
SHUT UP or get a proper job yourself
HYPOCRITE