Homes on green fields off Bickland Water Road refused: UPDATE

First published in News

UPDATE: A bid to build a new housing development on agricultural land which currently acts as a “green buffer” between Falmouth and Budock Water have been refused by Cornwall councillors, despite being recommended for approval.

Midas Commercial Developments has applied for outline planning permission for the development of up to 153 new homes, estate roads and an area of open space on the land off Bickland Water Road.

Members of Cornwall Council’s west sub-area planning committee will debate the project today, Monday (February 10) when planning officer Hollie Nicholls will urge them to approve it subject to conditions and the company entering into a legally-binding agreement to secure a number of demands.

These include 38.5 per cent of the development being affordable, contributions towards highway and education improvement, travel plan measures and the transfer of a neighbouring field to Falmouth Town Council for use as a cemetery.

The scheme is opposed by both Budock Parish Council and Falmouth Town Council who object to the loss of grade two agricultural land and have concerns over highway safety. Budock councillors also claim there is no need for more houses within the parish and there is a need to retain the “buffer zone.”

English Heritage also has concerns over the impact the development would have on the grade II listed St Budock Church. Fifteen letters of objection have also been received by Cornwall Council and two in support.

In her report to councillors, Ms Nicholls addresses the concerns raised by objectors and says they do not justify the application being refused.

She says: “The landform means the impact of the development on the character of the area would be very limited and the locally important distinction between the urban area of Falmouth and the village of Budock Water would be preserved.”

In relation to the impact of the proposed development upon the church she added: “It is commonplace for residential development to surround churchyards even where the host church is a listed building and it would be no difference in this instance.”

The loss of the grade II agricultural land is almost deemed acceptable.

She said: “It is inevitable that if Falmouth is to expand to meet its needs for future generations, that best and most versatile land would be lost to some extent,” says Ms Nicholls.

 

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:18pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Ian Bennett says...

I wonder whether the people who oppose new housing developments are the same people who complain that their children have to move away from Cornwall because there are so few houses.
I wonder whether the people who oppose new housing developments are the same people who complain that their children have to move away from Cornwall because there are so few houses. Ian Bennett
  • Score: -5

7:42pm Tue 11 Feb 14

Gillian R.Z. Martin says...

I am in favour of affordable housing, in the right locations in conjunction with the right facilities, however, I believe in this instance Budock Water Parish Council, Falmouth Town Council and Cornwall Council have made the right decision in not supporting and in the refusal of the use of this agricultural site, I believe the provision for adequate infrastructure has not been adequately addressed, in addition to which, I believe there is at least a five year supply of land, currently making this particular application of land use, a little premature at least for consideration.
I am in favour of affordable housing, in the right locations in conjunction with the right facilities, however, I believe in this instance Budock Water Parish Council, Falmouth Town Council and Cornwall Council have made the right decision in not supporting and in the refusal of the use of this agricultural site, I believe the provision for adequate infrastructure has not been adequately addressed, in addition to which, I believe there is at least a five year supply of land, currently making this particular application of land use, a little premature at least for consideration. Gillian R.Z. Martin
  • Score: 3

10:09pm Tue 11 Feb 14

victoriameldrew says...

I am delighted with this decision. Like Gill, I am aware that affordable housing is needed but, this is just the wrong place to build it. I travel along Bickland Water Road every day and, on school mornings it is a very dangerous place with mothers and fathers parking all over the place to get their children to school, factory workers getting to work and me, and others like me, commuting to their workplace. Hopefully any appeals will also fail and we will never have houses and whatever built on that particular piece of land.
I am delighted with this decision. Like Gill, I am aware that affordable housing is needed but, this is just the wrong place to build it. I travel along Bickland Water Road every day and, on school mornings it is a very dangerous place with mothers and fathers parking all over the place to get their children to school, factory workers getting to work and me, and others like me, commuting to their workplace. Hopefully any appeals will also fail and we will never have houses and whatever built on that particular piece of land. victoriameldrew
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree