Three storey 'extension’ would be new home say councillors

PLANS to build a three storey ‘extension’ to a house in Trelawney Road have been rejected by councillors who ruled the new building would be a new house on the street.

Neighbours had raised concerns over the proposals, saying the new building would not fit in with the rest of the street, would cause potential parking problems and would be an overdevelopment of the site.

Local resident Louise Brett spoke at the meeting to express her concerns, saying that the planning application in question was described in the proposal as ‘the construction of an extension to an existing house’.

She added: “However, on the plans there are no connecting doors providing access from the existing house to the new one. I am no expert but in my mind this is a separate house not an extension.”

She said: “I am also concerned that allowing three storeys to be built on Trelawney Road will set a new precedent for a wave of three-storey developments.

“This is an historic part of Falmouth and I believe it is in the public interest that its integrity is kept for future generations.”

She also expressed concern over a loss of privacy if the new building was allowed, as it would overlook her garden.

Councillor Alan Jewell said: “I did a site visit last week and these plans would use up the very last little piece of that site. I am also concerned it would be a new house because you cannot access the new property from the old one.”

Councillor Jenny Booth added: “I propose we turn this application down on the grounds in it an overdevelopment, it is un-neighbourly and it would increase a fear of crime in the area.”

The committee voted unanimously to reject the plans. The proposals will now be considered by Cornwall Council before a final decision is made.

Comments(4)

Zella says...
10:30am Mon 9 Jul 12

That is the first time I have heard that building a new house/extension would increase the fear of crime!! strange philosophy.

Could the same not be said about the proposed Premier Inn?

Poldark says...
2:27pm Mon 9 Jul 12

I also find it strange that some of those conditions were not applied to the Premier inn, not in keeping overdevelopment an parking concerns, why did they not think it was worth the effort to put these conditions on the Premier Inn?
I understand it might have been intimidating with both Cllr Varney and Eva sitting there listening to the proceedings, surely as one is head of Strategic planning and the other one vice chair of planning, they should have waited until the application came before the county or register an interest? when voting ?

ucsweb says...
8:40am Tue 10 Jul 12

It never fails to amaze me that if the public do not want planning to be approved then none of these reasons is valid. If for some reason a councillor wants it refused they cease to be afraid of the cost of an appeal.

DCI Jen says...
12:03pm Tue 10 Jul 12

What are Ms Merretts views on the subject?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree