Mullion Meadows dedicated footpath 'unfeasible'

A plan to create a dedicated legal footpath across the driveway of Mullion Meadows has been withdrawn, with the owner calling it “unfeasible”.

Martin Raftery, who owns the small complex of businesses in Mullion, said the situation would now remain as it always had done, where there was a non-formal agreement that anyone could walk across the driveway.

He had originally offered to dedicate a new section of footpath if objectors to the diversion of Footpath 37, which runs across his land, withdrew their complaints. This would have prevented the need for an inquiry by the Planning Inspectorate. This did not happen, however, with the inquiry going ahead and the diversion ultimately given permission.

Since then Mr Raftery has been in talks with Cornwall Council about the footpath, with the two parties unable to reach an agreement. Mr Raftery said the council wanted the footpath to be two metres wide, across the driveway to Mullion Meadows, with two exits.

He said the width the council was asking for was just not possible, as the complex would lose too much of its driveway. If cars were parked along the edge, there would not be enough space for cars to drive past, he added.

Mr Raftery said: “It’s just not feasible. People can still walk there – it’s just not a dedicated footpath. But we’re not stopping anybody walking through.”

A spokesperson for Cornwall Council said: “The council understands that the owner of Mullion Meadows has withdrawn an offer that he had made to dedicate two additional sections of public footpath on land at Mullion Meadows.

“The decision to withdraw the offer of dedication is entirely within the gift of the owner of the land and the council has no power to compel the landowner to dedicate the paths.”

The spokesperson added that the Footpath 37 diversion order had been confirmed and had come into effect. The row over the footpath at Mullion Meadows followed an application by Mr Raftery to divert part of the public Footpath 37 and a section of unrecorded footpath, as well as ‘stop up’ two sections of unrecorded footpath, in order to complete work on a new office building. This had been built on top of a section of footpath. This led to an outcry by some members of the public who argued that the footpath should not be moved.

Construction work had been put on hold since October 2010 while a decision over the footpath was reached.

Comments(1)

Gill Zella Martin says...
11:23am Fri 31 Aug 12

Mr Raftery has never prevented anyone from using the driveway or the front entrance to enter and leave the property from on foot, in the same way that he has never prevented anyone from using the toilets situated on the complex. Additionally there are the steps half way up the driveway, which some people are happy to use anyway to enter or leave the complex. I have never found the front gates locked on the front of the premises and even if they were one could climb over them much the same as a stile. The whole issue in my opinion is yet again a fuss about nothing. Having already wasted tax payers money on an enquiry for goodness sake let this one drop now. In reality, some people walk exactly where they like anyway, footpath or no footpath, I cut through someones back garden by mistake one day, I thought it was a bit strange there was not only a picnic bench but a washing line.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree